Tag: multi-channel

Collect in store – an elegant example from The Futon Company

This is an elegant example of offering a “collect in store” option. I think all too often “reserve and collect” on an ecommerce site can be overly complex, with too many checkout stages, an unnecessary search to locate your nearest store, and restrictions on which products can be collected from which stores.

The Futon Company admittedly only has 20 or so stores, and probably most orders would be for a single item; the checkout process gets less elegant later on if you want to amend products and delivery options. But I do like the simplicity of presenting the store options on the product page, and how the the benefit (“Collect from Store save £45″) is communicated.

Site review: Zara Home

This site, launched in 2007, is run by a subsidiary of Zara parent Inditex, ITX e-commerce Ireland. The site apparently made a loss of €692,000 during the year to the end of January 2009.


Homepage/ general

Initial impressions; the design is on-brand, nice and colourful.

It’s clearly an online shop, and you know you’re shopping in the right country.

The header is unusually short (and the logo is small), but this does mean most of the homepage is above the fold.

Receive our news is very prominent; some people might expect this to be the search box. It doesn’t need to appear on every page, and the position almost crowds out the page heading. There’s also a be the first to subscribe button which is duplication, and looks slightly out of place with the other nice images.

The search box is actually quite far down the page; we’re not really encouraged to use it as the search function is not particularly sophisticated. It’s a basic text search returning products (not categories) including all the search terms, and there are no options to refine the search. Search for “small table” and you find one page of table accessories which include the word “small” in the description. Search for “furniture” and nothing is found.

Free delivery is promised, but when you click on this it’s only over £150 – I wouldn’t bother with this, as it’s not that attractive an offer; customers would expect free delivery over £20 or £50. We’re not told how much delivery is (an astonishing £19 for all orders under £150!) unless you click on the Shopping Guide (which I had assumed would be a style guide) on the left hand side, or on the small See delivery charges link in the shopping basket. In fact it would be easy to enter your address details and get to the payment page before you’re hit with the £19 charge.

Navigation is on the right hand side rather than at the top; I suspect because it’s more flexible (and good for SEO). It works fine for the range as most product categories don’t have more than 5 sub-categories.

Zara Home Kids is a mini site within the main site with a slightly different colour scheme and its own logo, homepage and product categorisation. You click on the Zara Home or Zara Home Kids buttons above the search box to switch between the two sites. It’s nice to give the Kids range its own identity (although I would make it more Kids-like) but it would also be good to somehow link the ranges e.g. shopping for tableware in the main section would link to the Kids tableware section. (The solution also means that if you have products from the main range and the kids range in the basket the header of the basket page is the Kids logo).

There’s a Zara Home on your mobile link to the iphone app, which is a showcase of product images with a “buy” link taking you to the Worldwide homepage . Not that useful, but nice images to browse through on the tube, and as such it’s rated 2 stars (slightly lower than the main Zara app).

There are 15 different country sites, and the current one e.g. United Kingdom is displayed to the left of the shopping basket, almost within the basket. The link (which goes to the list of country sites) is as prominent as the View basket link which it doesn’t need to be, although fortunately if you navigate away and come back again the basket contents are retained. In the footer you can change the language of the site (e.g. view the UK site in German) which has a slight potential for confusion with changing the country site; perhaps some explanation (in text, symbols or flag) would help.

Contact details appear at the bottom right, and even then only a link to an email form. There’s no phone number evident, although there is an 0800 number very much hidden within the Terms and Conditions in the Returns section. The 0800 number also appears at the top of the shopping cart, so why not earlier? The email form itself requires you to fill out all 6 fields – there are no optional fields so they don’t really need to state Required fields are indicated with *.

The Gift card section describes gift cards which can be bought instore; online gift cards (bought and redeemed online) would work well I think.

Just a minor point, but some of the text does look as if it’s written by an non-English speaker e.g. “Gifts for Her – Enter to see it all”.

Category/ product summary pages

The category pages e.g. Living room are a clever combination of one large feature product with a lifestyle image, descriptive text, special offers (below) and links with images to the sub categories (to the right). Some categories have their own bespoke layout e.g. Gifts, Basics and Trends, and some e.g. Gift baskets link straight to the products without the subcategory level. It’s a good example of tailoring the navigation to suit the product range.

Product summary pages e.g. Kitchen textiles are well laid out with large (just over 200px square) thumbnail images. There’s a mixture of cutout/ white background and coloured background images, but on a pale page background with a slight image border they work well together.

Products are shown in a random order and there are no sort or filter options. I don’t really see this as an issue as there are 12 products per page and most subcategories have 1 or 2 pages (with the option to view all). It encourages you to explore the range, and focusses on the products rather than the prices.

Where a product is available in more than one colour/ pattern this is shown with a clickable icon to the top right of the thumbnail image, which changes the thumbnail image itself. The choice is then carried through to the product page. This is one of the best solutions I’ve seen for displaying product with colour/ pattern options. If a product is available in more than one size this is indicated with a price range (e.g. £89.90 - £319.90) and a thumbnail image incorporating the different options. Again, a good solution to presenting options at the summary level.

Products which are reduced or on special offer are highlighted with the sale price in a big red font and the original price in small font below.

New products are highlighted with a NEW flash across the thumbnail image.

There’s no stock information on the summary page which could be slightly annoying if the product is subsequently unavailable on the product page e.g.

Product pages

There are well laid out with a large image (almost 400px square) and good call to action with the add to basket button. There’s a nice Glossary feature to tell you for example what cotton is.

Most product only have one image, although there is a More photos section on all products. There’s a good zoom function, although it’s not spelt out that it’s there.

When there is only one product option the quantity box defaults to 1, and when there is more than one option the default is 0. There is clear information about sizing and product composition, although there could be more descriptive and aspirational copy (e.g. more than Plain mohairwool fringed blanket.)

There seems to be very few related products set up, which may be a missed opportunity as this is done well elsewhere in the Showroom section.

There are good pop up guides to sizes and product care instructions, done in the same way as the glossary.

The returns policy is shown below the main product image, striking the right balance I think between showing the information but not in a negative way. Unfortunately this links to the entire terms and conditions section so you have to find the returns policy within it. Offering returns to store is a positive feature. It would be good to see delivery information here too (although maybe £19 is nothing to shout about)!

I like how you can scroll between the products within a category with the Previous and Next buttons, and the Back to category link.

Shopping cart/ checkout

I’ve mentioned the delivery information (or lack of) earlier.

The basket has a good informative layout with an image, colour and size information.

There’s an option to Giftwrap your order which appears to be free – so why not shout about this? I would choose to giftwrap everything, just for fun!

The process is a clear 4 stages – Shopping basket, Address, Payment, Confirmation. Creating an account with a password is required, although this is handled reasonably well within the same page with radio buttons: This is the first time I am purchasing on the Zara Home website / I have previously purchased on the Zara Home website.

Finally…

Overall this is well designed ecommerce site in terms of the look and feel and functionality, and works well for the particular range of products. The site does the basics very well, although obvious areas for improvement are the search function, offering more ways of viewing and filtering products, and expanding the “We also recommend” related products.

The £19 delivery charge is a bit puzzling, and I wonder how this has been arrived at and how much testing of other options has been carried out. Perhaps it has been shown to increase the average order size and maximise profitability. Or perhaps Zara are still testing the water with a transactional website (which they don’t offer yet with the main clothing side of the business).

Trends in internet retailing

This is a nice summary of key trends, from internetretailing.net

  • Multi-channel integration. Online consumers are getting ever more demanding, and ever more intolerant when retailers fail to join up their multi-channel dots. A seamless cross-channel experience, driven by a single view of the customer, will become a core requirement for success in the years ahead.
  • Mobile. The potential of mobile as a new channel for retailers has received much of the industry’s attention over the last few months. The ability for customers to easily price check, find the latest coupons and deals and purchase online from their mobile phone — even in-store — is going to lead to significant changes in shopping habits.
  • Mobile – again. One of the most interesting developments is likely to be the way in which mobile will link into retailers’ multi-channel strategies as a way to connect up the different channels through technologies such as mobile barcodes, coupons and NFC.
  • Delivery. Fulfilment and delivery service providers have responded well over the last few months, introducing ever more sophisticated delivery options. ‘One size fits all’ is no longer enough.
  • Personalisation. Everything from personalised on-site recommendation engines to tightly targeted email campaigns will be key to delivering growth as internet retailing becomes ever more competitive in the years ahead.
  • Choice. Whether it’s offering a wide range of ways to pay, or options for the frequency of marketing emails, consumers are set to expect online retailers to use information gained from previous purchases and site visits to tailor the offering to meet their particular needs.
  • Social media. On the one hand, social media has now become quite entrenched. On the other, however, an understanding of the ways in which social media can be leveraged to aid business decisions is still in its early days and is set to deliver significant commercial advantage to those who gain the greatest expertise.
  • Email. Still very much a key sales driver, and one that internet retailers still need to be investing in and making a key development priority.

Is adwords ever “not cost effective”?

I was talking to the owner of Sunspel, a website selling luxury menswear both online and offline, who came out with the statement “Adwords is not cost effective for us” (not for product-related keywords, only for brand-related keywords).

My main experience with Adwords was for Viners.co.uk where my adwords campaigns generated 50% of sales at a cost per conversion of around 10% of the average order value – so very cost effective, in fact the most cost effective marketing channel in that particular case.

Of course an adwords campaign will not be particularly cost effective if the keywords chosen are not relevant, if ads are poorly written, and landing pages are poor. But the point made by Sunspel was that there were too many competitors bidding on keywords like “T Shirt” or “mens clothes”, and with so much competition it’s difficult to push a luxury message vs. a price-based message.

To some extent I had it easy running campaigns for a site selling mostly cutlery, where the majority of traffic came for a handful of “cutlery”-related keywords. And there are fewer Adwords competitors in the world of cutlery than T shirts. But to a much bigger extent Adwords was cost effective due to constant optimization; stopping keywords and ads which were not cost effective, refining keywords and ads which were more cost effective; constantly looking for trends and opportunities in the long tail of search terms.

Incremental sales, or cannibalising from other channels?

Reading about the imminent launch of a Gap ecommerce site in the UK got me thinking about to what extent online sales are incremental, or merely cannibalised from existing channels.
Gap in the UK has been a notable latecomer to online retailing (along with Primark, H&M, Zara, Claire’s Accessories, Morrisons…). In the US it has been trading online since 1997; in the UK it been testing the water with an online offering through asos.com.

It’s interesting reading discussions about why brands aren’t trading online. This one assumes that online sales have the potential to bring in 10% of total offline sales. Whilst this seems a reasonable ballpark for any retailer, it can’t be assumed that the 10% will be incremental and not simply customers who would have bought in store switching to buying online instead. It’s difficult for most brands to assess whether or not online sales are incremental, because there are so many competing factors determining retail sales and customer behaviour. Perhaps in Gap’s case the uplift would not be significant – as Gap’s stores are fairly widespread and I suspect the customer base is fairly loyal. Perhaps this has been their experience in the US, hence the slowness to launch online?

In some cases there’s a more compelling case for incremental sales – for a retailer with stores only in one part of the country, online opens up a much wider market. In my own experience working for a retailer with 15 or so stores located in factory outlet centres I don’t believe there was much cannibalisation from the stores, however there was almost certainly cannibalisation from other consumer and trade channels.

Of course there are many more benefits to trading online; lower cost of sale, brand building, more marketing channels, more flexible pricing & merchandising and the multichannel benefits (customers researching online, purchasing in store and vice versa). It is always better to be selling online yourself rather than through a third party, to be able to control pricing and how the brand is portrayed (on other sites and in their online advertising).

I did find a survey from 1999 predicting only 6% of online sales would be incremental. I would guess the experience of most brands is even lower than this. My conclusion? Not selling online is a missed opportunity, but the opportunity is complex and about much more than just sales.

What is the secret to a successful website?

This is a fantastic article – So true, I could have written it myself…

I particularly like the closing paragraph:

Management must realise just how complex a job it is [managing a website] and ensure you have time dedicated to its execution. Perhaps you should print off this article and give it to them.

What is the secret to a successful website?

Building usability into ecommerce design

With a specialist website, selling one product or category of products, thinking early on about the best way to present products can be beneficial. Not only will you improve usability and conversion rate from the start but it’s an opportunity to make the site stand out from competitors, both the not-as-well-designed specialist shops and the more general retailers using the same layouts to sell a huge variety of different products.

Two contrasting examples I’ve worked on are cutlery and umbrellas.

In the first example, Viners cutlery, I was responsible for the design. Through looking at other websites selling cutlery (good and bad), and understanding patterns of sales through the company’s other sales channels, I made sure each cutlery range was presented with a means of ordering cutlery sets and loose pieces all on the same page (without having to go back and forward to the shopping basket).

Hence this page…

product layouts - Viners

… is the same in terms the product hierarchy as this page…

product layouts - Viners 2

The difference being, a customer is much more likely to purchase more than one product from a range of cutlery (e.g. some knives and some forks, or a cutlery set and some extra teaspoons). With cookware, it’s less likely a customer would want to purchase more than one saucepan. And there’s more detailed information on a saucepan on the product detail page a customer would want to see before making the purchasing decision.

In my second example, Fulton Umbrellas, my involvement was much further down the line, when the design was almost complete. The first design I saw showed around 10 umbrellas on the womens page, mostly black and with technical descriptions like Superslim-1 and Open and Close – 3. This was the way the company presented the range to trade customers, but obviously not the optimal way on B2C online shop; because consumers don’t know the difference between a Superslim and an Open and Close, and because a consumer looking at that page wouldn’t know unless they clicked on it that the black umbrella pictured came in 10 different designs.

Unfortunately the ecommerce platform chosen was limited in the filter and sort views available; the ideal solution would have been to allow the customer to view by type, by colour, by pattern, by price etc. however, the least-bad option for launch was to show all the products.

product layouts - Fulton

ECommerce: a threat not an opportunity?

I’ve encountered various companies where having an ecommerce website was seen as a threat to other channels in the business – either conflicting with other retail channels (“you’re stealing my customers!”) or conflicting with wholesale channels (“why should I buy from you when you’re selling direct?”).

Perhaps people who are used to meetings and sales rep visits are suspicious of a world where you don’t need to have ever met your developers and agencies, where you can supply a product data feed to a customer rather than send a sales rep with a suitcase full of samples, where customers can receive an instant quote using bulk prices and customer-specific pricing…

Here are some tips, learnt the hard way.

Make retail channels work together, not against each other:

  • Tempt in-store shoppers to visit the website with voucher codes and web-exclusive offers
  • Tempt online shoppers into stores to view the product, buy there and then, or order online with free delivery, and consider allowing online purchases to be returned to stores.

Maximise incremental online sales by having a ecommerce strategy that encompasses your own website(s) and online marketing, and other websites selling your products:

  • If retailers can offer incremental sales (e.g. if they have large email databases, a wide offering of brands, or invest in offline marketing) assist with product images, suggested online retail prices and product information
  • If an online retailer is merely competing with you in SEO and PPC, limit the range of products available to them and consider an affiliates scheme instead
  • Have a AdWords trademark use strategy (you can no longer stop other ads appearing in searches for a trademarked term, but you can stop other ads using your brand name in the ad copy).

Involve other departments in online development & merchandising:

  • Try and build shared ownership of online sales
  • Educate colleagues in the basics of online (where traffic & sales are coming from, key trends).